Method for optimizing the control of a free turbine power package for an aircraft, and control for implementing same

ABSTRACT

A method optimizing fuel-injection control with driving speeds of apparatuses adjusted by controlling a turbine speed according to power, and optimizing control of a free turbine power package of an aircraft, including a low-pressure body, supplying power to apparatuses and linked to a high-pressure body. The method varies the low-pressure body speed to obtain a minimum speed for the high-pressure body, so power supplied by the apparatuses remains constant. Power supplied by the apparatuses is dependent upon the apparatuses driven speed by the low-pressure body, and a speed set point of the low-pressure body is dependent upon a maximum value of minimum speeds of the apparatuses, enabling required power to be optimized, upon a positive or zero incrementation added to the speed set point of the low-pressure body to minimize speed of the high-pressure body to the apparatuses power supply.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to a method for optimizing the regulation of a free-turbine power unit capable of supplying power in an aircraft, as well as a regulation control unit for implementing this method.

The invention relates to free-turbine power units which are fitted in aircrafts, for example airplanes and helicopters, capable of supplying power. Notably, these units can supply power to the equipments (alternators, pumps, superchargers, air conditioning) of the aircraft, directly and/or indirectly via power transfer boxes with multiple-reduction reducers.

These power units include auxiliary power units (in an abbreviated form: APUs) and main power units (in an abbreviated form: MPUs). APUs are used for starting up the main engines of aircrafts and/or for supplying non-propulsive energy (pneumatic, electric and/or hydraulic) on the ground. Certain secured APUs can also intervene in flight in the event of a failure of an engine and try to restart it and/or supply energy to the equipments.

MPUs belong to the engine category because they meet safety standards for main engines, in particular in case of a failure of an engine. Such units are based on an APU which was made more reliable, both in terms of materials and dimensions, in order to obtain the engine-type labelling.

A power unit typically includes an assembly of compressors/chambers of combustion/turbines forming a gas generator. After air/fuel mixture and combustion, hot gases are expanded in the stages of the high-pressure turbine (HP in an abbreviated form) which partially transmits the generated thermal power to the stages of the HP compressor via a high-pressure shaft or HP body. The thermal power of the exhaust gases also drives a free turbine (in an abbreviated form: TL) which, in turn, mechanically transmits power, via a low pressure LP shaft, to the equipments (alternators, pumps, supercharger, etc.) of power generator.

STATE OF THE ART

Typically, a regulation system supplies and measures the quantity of fuel injected into the combustion chamber of the gas generator so as to adjust it to the required level of power. The HP body speed adapts to this injection, after acceleration or deceleration, to reach a constant speed level and supply a thermal power to the LP body. The power transmitted to the LP body supplies then the required power at the constant speed required by the electronic control box (BEC).

In a power unit, the fuel injection regulation comprises, in a known way, the following steps:

-   -   pressurizing the fuel in order to inject it at the appropriate         pressure into the combustion chamber,     -   measuring out the fuel flow within the predetermined flow rate         limits to adjust the level of power supplied by the gas         generator to the required level,     -   measuring and controlling the rotor speed of the HP body so that         said speed remains within the predetermined working limits,     -   measuring and controlling the rotor speed of the LP body, and     -   determining the set-point value of the HP body speed according         to the difference between the set-point value of the LP body         speed and its measured speed, as well as the set-point value of         the fuel flow to be injected into the combustion chamber         according to the difference between the determined set-point         value of the HP body speed and its previously measured value.

The rotational speed of each equipment is then imposed by the preliminary choice of its speed close to its permissible maximal speed, where its power supply capacity is maximal. In these conditions, the mass and cost of each equipment are minimized for a permanent functioning at this speed. Furthermore, some equipments like the supercharger must be able to supply a variable adjusted flow, low on the ground and important in flight. The flow rate is expressed in adjusted values in order to make it possible to compare flow rates irrespective of the ambient conditions at air inlet. For a functioning in the whole flight envelope, a variable geometry of the air flow is then provided on the supercharger.

The optimization of such conformations of the fuel injection regulation is achieved by holding the speeds of the driven equipments close to the maximal speeds by the LP body in order to supply the required amounts of power. In particular, no variation in the drive speed of the supercharger is used. And the mere choice of a variable geometry of the air flow imposes then a cumbersome and expensive definition of the supercharger.

The preliminary choice of the speed of the TL turbine is thus guided only by the achieving the maximal-power supply, without any efficiency optimization during the supply of varied levels of power.

In these conditions, during power transients, the regulation system of the power unit reacts only when a LP body underspeed which is lower than the LP body set speed is detected. The speed excursions on the LP body in the power transients are then important because of the high response times of the control loops and the low inertia of the LP shaft with regard to a gas generator with connected power turbine. Considerable speed variations outside the permissible ranges can been seen, in particular excursions beyond the maximal speeds in case of sudden power shed, or below minimal speeds in case of a high need for power.

So, in case of overspeed, the equipments which are driven together are not capable any more of supplying the power required for each of them. In case of overspeed, a monitoring means stops immediately the power unit because of its certification, and thus all the power supplies are not provided any longer.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The invention aims precisely at optimizing the fuel injection regulation in order to avoid the above mentioned problems. To do this, the drive speeds of the equipments are adapted by means of a regulation of the TL turbine speed according to the power.

More precisely, the object of the invention is a method for optimizing the regulation of a free-turbine power unit of the above described type and capable of supplying power to the equipments of an aircraft. In this method, the LP body speed varies in order to obtain a minimal HP body speed so that the power supplied by the equipments remains constant.

According to a preferred embodiment, since the amounts of power supplied by the equipments are dependent upon the speed they are driven by the LP body, the TL turbine LP body speed set-point is dependent upon the maximal value of the equipment minimal speeds enabling the respectively required amounts of power to be obtained in an optimized manner and upon a positive or zero incrementation added to the LP body speed set-point in order to minimize the HP body speed at equal power supplied by the equipments.

According to a particular embodiment, a power measurement supplied continuously by each of the equipments makes it possible to detect a stabilized operation of the requests for power supply and, in that case, to activate the incrementation.

According to advantageous embodiments, the incrementation is determined by calculation from the efficiency curves of the equipments and free turbine or by detecting the variation in the HP body speed, the incrementation being then applied until the HP body speed is minimal.

In particular when an incrementation is determined by calculation, for each equipment, for a level of thermal power of the HP body transmitted to the LP body and for each ambient condition of temperature and pressure at the inlet of the power unit, there is a rotational speed of the LP body which makes it possible to supply a maximal mechanical power to its shaft.

Advantageously, the power supplied to each equipment being maintained within the limits of a range calculated by the manufacturer, the speed at which this equipment is directly or indirectly driven by the LP turbine determines a capacity of supplying power within these limits. The supply of such power according to this capacity makes it thus possible to use only a part power which avoids any wasting and which is defined between the requested need for power and the supplied level of power. For each equipment, the supplied level of power is thus a function of the speed at which it is driven and the supply of a required power is optimized according to the speed at which it is driven.

Besides, the determination of the set-point speed of the LP turbine makes it possible to increase the speed of the equipments to a maximum in order to:

-   -   make the equipments function at full capacity in the whole         flight envelope,     -   increase the overall efficiency of the LP turbine and         equipments, so as to reduce the fuel consumption,     -   limit the noise generated by the equipments by varying their         speed within the defined ranges, in particular on the ground.

Furthermore, when operating in flight, the supercharger has then an additional degree of freedom through the rotational speed variation. A reduction of its bulk can so be achieved while keeping the same performance.

The in-flight adjusted air flow is sizing for the supercharger. It can take place at maximum speed. Thus, on the ground, since the required adjusted air flow is lower, the drive speed is reduced. Besides, the variation in efficiency of a TL turbine leads to increase its speed in flight with regard to the ground. The combination of these two factors results in a reduction in the fuel consumption.

Besides, an optimal efficiency and sound level can be obtained for each equipment according to the speed at which it is driven speed which deducts from the power supplied to each equipment according to the above method. In particular, the speed decrease reduces the sound level emitted by the supercharger and gas generator, which makes it possible to meet the noise pollution requirements on the ground and on final approach.

According to advantageous embodiments, the LP body rotational speed set-point is regulated firstly and all the time in order to:

-   -   adjust the rotational speed of the LP body to the supply of the         power required by each of the equipments;     -   adjust the rotational speed of the LP body to the maximal         overall efficiency by minimization of the power to be supplied         by the HP body according to the required power;     -   adjust the rotational speed of the LP body to specific         conditions of use, in particular to minimize the sound level.

According to a preferred embodiment, the method provides an additional step of anticipation in which a power unit HP body speed set-point is regulated according to the variation in the required power and/or in the measured power. Advantageously, this “anticipation” function anticipates the normal reaction of a regulation of the engine rate. It makes it possible to anticipate the applied variation in the HP body rotational speed in order to go from a previous request for power associated with the previous HP body speed to a new request for power associated with the HP body speed to be obtained in a steady-state condition. The very soon known data about the required power variation makes it then possible to best anticipate the HP body reaction.

The instantaneous knowledge of the required power, which makes it possible to act immediately on the HP body set-point and thus directly on the HP speed, enables much lower excursions of LP body speeds. These obtained variations thus stay within the limits permitted by the manufacturers of the equipments and the range limits of the TL turbine, the excursions decreasing, for instance, from 30 to 10%. No shedding is necessary and the reliability of the power supply is secured.

The present invention also relates to a regulation control unit capable of implementing the above method. This control combines a LP body speed governor, a HP body speed governor and a fuel-flow regulator. The LP body speed governor includes a comparison tool for elaborating a LP body speed set-point from the measurements transmitted by means for measuring the amounts of power supplied and minimal rotational speeds corresponding to the amounts of power required by each equipment driven by the power unit from power variation data according to the speed for each equipment.

A subtracter measures the difference between the so elaborated set-point and the LP body speed. This difference is transmitted to a first converter which converts it into a HP body speed difference to be transmitted to the HP body speed governor. This HP regulator includes means for elaborating a HP body speed set-point from the first converter. The HP speed set-point goes through a limiting filter which redefines the set-point values within permissible ranges.

The redefined set-point value is then transmitted to the flow regulator in the form of a flow-rate set-point via a second converter. In the flow regulator, the set-point value goes through a limiting filter, which redefines the set-point values within permissible ranges, before being transmitted, in the form of a command, to a fuel-metering valve.

According to particular embodiments:

-   -   a subtracter of HP body speed values at two successive moments         supplies correcting increments to the tool for elaborating the         LP speed set-point, while taking the constancy of the power         measured in a tool for correcting the LP body speed into         account;     -   a noise limiting filter is also coupled with the LP body speed         correcting tool;     -   an anticipation comparator is capable of correcting the power         unit HP body speed set-point, according to the variation between         the supplied power and the measured power, before it is         submitted to the speed-limiting filter;     -   a means for measuring the power supplied continuously to each         equipment, the measurement being direct—in particular a         wattmeter or a torquemeter-tachometer assembly—or indirect by         calculation from data—in particular using the current-voltage         product coming from appropriate instruments;     -   the variations in the required power are quantified in a         digital-processing unit at the input of the HP speed governor         from the orders transmitted by the piloting and the control unit         of the aircraft flight systems as well as from other already         acquired parameters, in particular the ambient conditions of         temperature and pressure or the state of the inlets/outlets of         the power generator.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other aspects, characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear in the following non-restrictive description of particular embodiments, in reference to the accompanying drawings showing respectively:

in FIG. 1, a diagram of the curves of variation in the mechanical power supplied by the LP body to its shaft according to its rotational speed in various ambient conditions;

in FIG. 2, a curve of the efficiency of an equipment according to its drive speed in order to define the power required by this equipment; and

in FIG. 3, a block diagram of an example of regulation control unit according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

In reference to FIG. 1, curves C1 to Cn of the mechanical power supplied Pf by the LP body of a power unit fitted with a TL turbine are presented. The power Pf is represented according to the rotational speed V_(BP) of the LP body, for a defined ambient condition—of temperature and pressure at the inlet of the LP body and for various levels of thermal power of the HP body, HP1 to HPn. Each curve C1 to Cn has a “two-horned hat” profile. The power maxima, M1 to Mn, correspond then to optimal speeds V_(O1), . . . , V_(on) which are situated along an optimal curve C_(M). This optimal curve C_(M) is stored so that it can be used in the regulation control unit in order to determine the amplitude of the increment by calculation.

Besides, FIG. 2 shows the efficiency curve CR for a given level of power supplied to a given equipment, here a supercharger, according to the speed Ve at which this equipment is driven. The maximal efficiency R_(M) is obtained for an optimal speed V_(O) close to its permissible maximum speed V_(I). The speeds V_(O) for all the equipments are also stored in order to be used in the regulation control unit below.

In reference to FIG. 3, an example of regulation control unit 1 includes three regulators 11, 12 and 13. This regulation control unit is provided in a TL free-turbine power unit of an aircraft, in connection with the aircraft piloting system and control unit so as to receive regulation data and instructions. The regulators of the control unit 1 are the following:

-   -   a rotational-speed governor 11 for regulating the drive shaft of         the LP body of the power unit TL turbine,     -   a speed governor 12 for regulating the HP body of the power unit         TL turbine, and     -   a fuel-flow regulator 13 for the power unit.

For each equipment E1, E2, . . . , a curve Cm1 , Cm2, . . . , speeds V1, V2, . . . , corresponding to the required amounts of power Pd1 , Pd2, . . . —for each ambient condition of temperature and pressure at the inlet of the LP body—have been defined by the manufacturer. Each curve Cm1, Cm2, . . . , makes it all the time possible to know the minimal speed Vm1, Vm2, . . . , from which the equipment is capable of supplying a required part power.

In order to facilitate the data mining, the numerical values of the rotations of the equipments are converted into values of rotation of the LP shaft by taking into account the reduction and/or multiplication factors of the gear trains, which are centralized for example by means of a power transfer box.

For the set Ei of the equipments existing in the example, a maximal value Max(Vmi) of the minimal speeds Vmi is determined in the ambient conditions. This value Max(Vmi) is the maximal permissible speed for each equipment of set Ei. With this value Vmi, all the driven equipments are capable of supplying the power which is required from them. The obtained value Max(Vmi) can be advantageously compared with the permissible limitations, in particular for the range from 50% to 100%.

The so determined value Max(Vmi) is transmitted to a summer S1 of the LP body speed governor 11. At each elaboration of a LP body speed set-point, this summer S1 also integrates a positive LP speed increment “e”, here equal to 1%, so as to give a LP body speed set-point value C_(BP) such that:

C _(BP)=Max(Vmi)+e

The LP speed increment “e” is introduced conditionally, until the speed V_(HP) of the HP body is minimized. The variation in the HP body speed is monitored in the subtracter S2 by supplying a difference data “d”. If at moment t the value of the measured HP body rotational speed (V_(HP))t is lower than that at the previous moment t−1, (V_(HP))t−1, then the difference “d” between these values is negative. If, furthermore, the measured power Pm on the LP body has remained constant in this time interval (t-t−1), then a corrective tool O1—to which Pm applies—transmits a value of “e” equal to 1% to the summer S1. Should the opposite occur, the value of the increment is equal to 0. Such a correction makes it possible to free oneself from measurement oscillations and makes it possible to calculate the value of the increment “e”.

The incrementation can also be carried out through calculation. At given supplied power for each equipment, various forms can be used: modelling, formation of the equations and search for the minimal point, iteration, etc. The pursued goal is to find the LP body speed which minimizes the HP body speed while the power supplied by each of the equipments remains constant. For example, for an equipment i supplying a power Pmi, to each drive speed V_(BP) corresponds a driving power Pmi of the equipment i. The Pmi sum gives the power to be supplied by the LP body at this speed V_(BP). The curve in the form of a two-horned hat gives the corresponding value of V_(Hp). Calculation determines then the minimal value of V_(HP).

A data relating to noise B1 is advantageously introduced into the corrective tool O1. As long as the noise level in an equipment is higher than a ceiling value, e.g. 100 dB, the noise data also activates an increment “e” and the minimization of the noise at a level lower than this threshold is regulated in a similar way to that of speed V_(HP).

The set-point value C_(BP) for the LP body speed is supplied by the summer S1 and transmitted to a subtracter S3 which compares the measured value Vm_(BP) of the LP body speed with the value C_(BP). A converter C2 converts the LP body speed variation into an equivalent speed variation V_(HP) of the HP body.

This speed variation V_(HP) is transmitted to an anticipation subtracter S4 of the HP body speed regulator 12. The subtracter S4 compares this speed variation V_(HP)with the value coming from a comparator C3 for processing an anticipation “law”, so as to obtain the speed set-point value C_(HP) for the HP body.

This anticipation law consists in correcting the speed V_(HP) of the HP body according to the variation in the power Pd required from the equipments and also to the variation in the power measured on the drive shaft Pm.

The anticipation law thus makes it possible, from the variations in the amounts of power to be supplied and measured, to determine the variations in the requirement of power and to determine the variation in speed V_(HP) to be applied to meet a new need for power.

The speed set-point C_(HP) for the HP body is then compared with the limitation values in a limiting filter 22 which redefines the set-point values within permissible ranges.

At the output of the filter 22, the speed set-point C_(HP) is compared with the speed measurement Vm_(HP) in a subtracter S5. The obtained difference is integrated into a converter C4, which converts the speed difference into a fuel-flow difference so as to supply a fuel-flow set-point C_(C) as an output.

This fuel-flow set-point C_(C) is transmitted to the flow regulator 13, in the form of a command, to a fuel-metering valve 23 via a flow-limiting valve 24. The variation in the fuel flow injected into the combustion chamber of the power unit modifies then the HP body speed V_(HP), and thus the level of energy supplied. For a constant need for power, this variation the HP body speed V_(HP) modifies the LP body speed V_(BP): a new control loop is born to control the speeds. 

1-15. (canceled)
 16. A method for optimizing regulation of a TL free-turbine power unit of an aircraft provided with a low-pressure LP body which supplies power to equipments and which is linked to a high-pressure HP body, the method comprising: varying the LP body speed in accordance with a maximal value of minimal speeds of the equipments and with a positive or zero incrementation to obtain a minimal HP body speed so that the power supplied by the equipments remains constant.
 17. An optimization method according to claim 16, in which the power supplied by the equipments is dependent upon a speed at which the equipments are driven by the LP body, and a speed set-point of the LP body of the TL turbine is dependent upon a maximal value of the equipments minimal speeds enabling respectively required amounts of power to be obtained in an optimized manner and upon a positive or zero incrementation added to the speed set-point of the LP body to minimize the HP body speed at equal power supplied by the equipments.
 18. An optimization method according to claim 16, in which a power measurement supplied continuously by each of the equipments makes it possible to detect a stabilized operation of requests for power supply and, in that case, to activate the incrementation.
 19. An optimization method according to claim 16, in which the incrementation is determined by calculation from efficiency curves of the equipments and free turbine.
 20. An optimization method according to claim 19, in which, for each equipment, for a level of thermal power of the HP body transmitted to the LP body and for each ambient condition of temperature and pressure at an inlet of the power unit, there is a rotational speed of the LP body which makes it possible to supply a maximal mechanical power to its shaft.
 21. An optimization method according to claim 16, in which the incrementation is determined by detecting a variation in the HP body speed, the incrementation then applied until the HP body speed is minimal.
 22. An optimization method according to claim 16, in which a rotational speed set-point of the LP body is regulated at all times to adjust the LP body rotational speed to a supply of the power required by each of the equipments, and/or adjust the LP body rotational speed to the maximal overall efficiency by minimization of the power to be supplied by the LP turbine according to the required power, and/or adjust the LP body rotational speed to specific conditions of use, or to minimize the sound level.
 23. An optimization method according to claim 16, further comprising an anticipation in which a speed set-point of the HP body of the power unit is regulated according to a variation in the power required from the equipments and also to a variation in the power measured on the drive shaft.
 24. A regulation control unit capable of implementing the method according to claim 16, in which a LP body speed governor, a HP body speed governor, and a fuel-flow regulator are combined, the LP body speed governor including: a comparison tool for elaborating a LP body speed set-point from the measurements transmitted by means for measuring amounts of power supplied and minimal rotational speeds corresponding to amounts of power required by each equipment driven by the power unit from power variation data according to the speed for each equipment; and a subtracter measuring a difference between the elaborated set-point and the LP body speed, the difference being transmitted to a first converter which converts the difference into a HP body speed difference to be transmitted to the HP body speed governor, the HP regulator including means for elaborating a HP body speed set-point from the first converter, and the HP speed set-point going through a limiting filter which redefines the set-point values within permissible ranges, the redefined set-point being then transmitted to the flow regulator in a form of a flow-rate set-point via a second converter.
 25. A regulation control unit according to claim 24, in which the flow regulator set-point goes through a limiting filter, which redefines the set-point values within permissible ranges, before being transmitted to a fuel-metering valve.
 26. A regulation control unit according to claim 24, in which a subtracter of HP body speed values at two successive moments supplies correcting increments to the tool for elaborating the LP speed set-point, while taking constancy of the power measured in the tool for correcting the LP body speed into account.
 27. A regulation control unit according to claim 24, in which a noise limiting filter is coupled with the LP body speed correcting tool.
 28. A regulation control unit according to claim 24, in which an anticipation comparator is capable of correcting the HP body speed set-point according to variations of the power supplied and the power measured on the drive shaft, before it is submitted to the speed-limiting filter.
 29. A regulation control unit according to claim 28, in which the variations in the required power are quantified in a digital-processing unit at an input of the HP speed governor from orders transmitted by a piloting and the control unit of the aircraft flight systems and from other already acquired parameters.
 30. An aircraft comprising: a power unit; a control unit, for regulating the HP and LP body speeds and a fuel-flow rate in accordance with claim
 24. 